Even though IMR 4831 and H4831SC are distinctive powders, you'll find that in many situations, exactly where one of them is shown another will likely be also. Also, you'll find there is a reasonably regular marriage concerning them with reference to detailed loads.
Needless to say, the Hodgdon tech wouldn't endorse my mixing of various lot numbers, but I believe I understand why. It's a litigation-driven earth, plus some fool would surely deduce that he could mix H380 and H110 and think of his have personalized combination of powder. What a globe.
It really is possible that no additional discussion is needed, where situation we advocate setting up a brand new thread. If even so you are feeling your reaction is required it is possible to however accomplish that.
Sweet!! I will pick some up and give it a try out. Thank you men, I recognize it! I will Allow you to understand what I discover. I do have about a 50 % pound of 4350 I can try that to start with and find out what transpires.
In any case, I knew The 2 pounds of H4831SC utilised the exact same data, but I didn't know irrespective of whether there was something various among a pound of powder labeled "Severe" and one particular not so labeled. A phone to Hodgdon verified which they ended up in truth equivalent and the one variation was The emblem within the label.
I do know, rough situations. H4831SC will definitely do the job, I just didn't like the situation density when loaded extended. I don't keep in mind powder demand off the very best of my head but I used to be launching a Berger 168gr VLD at 3,000fps that is the place I normally purpose to become. Inside your case utilizing what you've (and what I must have accomplished) I would begin with the tip in the bearing surface area of the bullet h4831 vs h4831sc suitable with the shoulder/neck junction, and flirt with extending seating depths from there when you find a velocity node.
You might have to help make a number of a lot more posts to get cleared to carry out PM's. As soon as you reach that status I would publish during the labeled reloading section to check out if any person is in your area for the trade.
Im beneath the understanding I want to use h4831sc. I have examine that these powders are identical Moreover the shorter grain size of your sc. Should really I even now be looking out for h4381sc?
I could stack em in one gap but I wasn’t content with the velocity. Right after months, I acquired Fortunate and caught some H1000 on the net not to mention compensated slightly excess. The very up coming week at a gun present a guy had a complete circumstance of H1000 for $forty for each 1lb. I forget about the amount, but While using the H1000 I’m now pushing a 160gr about 3200 and it’s a moderate load.
locutus said: I nevertheless have a fantastic stockpile of H450, the ball powder equal of 4831, which flows via my powder steps effortlessly.
Regardless of the similarity in nomenclature, they're totally different powders, with IMR 4831 getting substantially faster when compared to the Hodgdon variants. Really don't handle them as the identical powder, as they most absolutely will not be.
The "SC" stands for Brief Reduce. I have never noticed a distinction between both powder dut I don't Feel I'd mix them.
I generally always get the h4831 vs h4831sc sc version. Using a powder evaluate it hangs up fewer due to shorter kernels and I think allows more consistent metering so less time you are taking trickling in the final bit of charge to make weight. So basically the SC will save you periods
I could stack em in a single hole but I wasn’t satisfied with the velocity. Just after months, I obtained Fortunate and caught some H1000 on the internet and of course compensated somewhat added. The extremely next week in a gun present a guy experienced a whole circumstance of H1000 for $forty per 1lb. I ignore the amount, but Together with the H1000 I’m now pushing a 160gr about 3200 and it’s a mild h4831sc load data load.